The Crystal Ball.

I know this was originally meant for Carine, as she requested for it, but if it helps anyone, hey.

NOTE: Mr. Sara INSISTS that these are only his ASSUMPTIONS and STRONGLY ADVISES AGAINST relying solely upon these said assumptions.

So don't sue our asses if they're not entirely accurate. Pretty please. The man's not omniscient you know.

Why then is he providing us with these "assumptions"?

So that hopefully, by some miracle of God, he can help idiots like me pass. =)

Oh and he was very confusing, so what I wrote down may be a tad confusing too... But I tried to make it as word-for-word as possible.

TORT: High Priority Topics (in descending level of importance)

• General negligence (Data Response)
• OLA (Essay)
• General defences (DR)
• Rylands v Fletcher (Es)

• Duty of care (Es)
• Damages/Injunction (Es)

• Private nuisance (DR)

TORT: Essay Questions

• OLA - Both '57 and '84 (How the law balances liability between visitors and non-visitors)
• Rylands v Fletcher - do we still need it? is there a need to reform the statute?
• General negligence
• Duty of care - liability for statement
• Defences
• Damages -statutes -restitution, res ipsa loquitor
• Injunction -private nuisance -trespass to land

TORT: Data Response Questions

• General negligence - Breach, Causation (novus actus interveniens, Barker v Chorus, Bolitho), Remoteness
• Defences

• OLA
• Private nuisance
• Rylands v Fletcher

• Duty of care
• Damages
• Injunction

...

CONTRACT: High Priority Topics (also provided by Sara - take it or leave it)

(also in descending order as to the level of importance)

• Misrepresentation (Es) (DR) (Both) -see if got breach of term first -statement of fact -addressed to addressee -addressee acted upon reliance on it -3/4 page -if you're not good don't answer - or DIE.

• Remedies under equity (Es) -Specific performance
• Consideration (DR) (Es) -Williams v Roffey Bros. -promissory estoppel
• Exclusion clause (DR) -Doctrine of incorporation -discuss common law first -Olley v Marlborough Court -contemplation -sufficiency -reasonableness -Chapelton v Barry - but that's not all - contra proferentum -Rambler Motors -then look at UCTA (limitation of liability)
• Mistake (DR) -common mistake (as to quality or existence)

• ITCLR (Es) -compare with consideration
• Offer and Acceptance (DR) -understand unilateral and bilateral

• Remedies under damages (DR) (outline) -Victoria Laundry -Hadley Baxendale

***

Well, that's all there is to it. Hope this helps. If it doesn't, don't come back and yell obscenities at me and tell me that my daughters will be born with three bottoms. Or elsewise.

Best of luck to all fellow exam-sitters. :)

Toodles~